Correlates of COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions and opinions about mandates among four groups of adults in South Africa with distinct vaccine intentions: Evidence from a large national survey

Type Working Paper - BMC Public Health
Title Correlates of COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions and opinions about mandates among four groups of adults in South Africa with distinct vaccine intentions: Evidence from a large national survey
Author(s)
Publication (Day/Month/Year) 2023
URL https://assets.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2346136/v1/9ec3d46c-3c68-495c-91ec-ecf2f7bd26e2.pdf?c=167​2933688
Abstract
Introduction: Despite a high number of recorded COVID-19 infections and deaths in South Africa, COVID-19 vaccine coverage remained low in March 2022, ten months into the national vaccine roll-out. This study provides evidence on the correlates of vaccine intentions, attitudes towards vaccination and opinions about mandates. Methods: We used data from the second COVID-19 Vaccine Survey (CVACS), a telephone survey conducted February-March 2022 among 3,608 South African adults who self-reported not being vaccinated against COVID-19. The survey instrument was designed in consultation with government, policymakers, and civil society; and segmented the sample into four distinct groups with different vaccine intentions (synonymous with vaccine hesitancy levels). Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to examine the sociodemographic characteristics, attitudes and behaviours associated with the different vaccination intentions groups. Thematic coding of responses to open-ended questions elicited insights on reasons for not being vaccinated and attitudes towards mandates. Results: Intentions to get vaccinated were greater among individuals with lower socio-economic status (MannWhitney Z=-11.3, p<0.001); those believing the vaccine protects against death (Kruskal-Wallis ??2=494, p<0.001); and those who perceived themselves at risk of COVID-19-related illness (??2=126, p<0.01). Vaccine intentions were lower among individuals who believed that the vaccine causes death (??2=163, p<0.001); believed that the vaccine is unsafe for the babies of pregnant/breastfeeding mothers, or the chronically ill (??2=123, p<0.01); those not trusting government health information about COVID-19 and the COVID-19 vaccine (Kendall’s ??=-0.41, p<0.01); and those in opposition to mandates (??=0.35, p<0.001). Only 25% supported mandates, despite 48% thinking mandates would work well, with 54% citing individual rights as their main reason for mandate opposition. Conclusion: The profile of individuals not vaccinated against COVID-19 as of March 2022 differed markedly by self-reported vaccination intentions, underscoring the importance of tailored demand-creation efforts. To achieve comprehensive vaccination coverage, interventions to instill trust in government health information, and in the safety and efficacy of vaccines are required early in a vaccination program given the rapid emergence of pervasive vaccine hesitancy. Mandates remain an option to increase coverage but need to be carefully considered given widespread opposition.

Related studies

»