Central Data Catalog
Citation Information
Type | Journal Article - Social Indicators Research |
Title | "Truth" and "reconciliation" as social indicators |
Author(s) | |
Volume | 81 |
Issue | 2 |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2006 |
URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9010-5 |
Abstract | Countries throughout the world are trying to move toward a more democratic future through truth and reconciliation processes, under the assumption that truth causes reconciliation and that reconciliation contributes to democratization. But are ‘‘truth’’ and ‘‘reconciliation’’ concepts that can be measured rigorously and reliability? I present evidence in this article that each can be measured as an attribute of individuals, based on a large survey conducted in South Africa. My findings indicate that truth does indeed contribute to reconciliation. But because reconciliation is quite capable of changing (and likely to change) over time, efforts must be made to track levels of reconciliation as an important social indicator. Many countries in transition would profit greatly from implementing a Reconciliation Barometer to measure movement toward or away from the consolidation of democratic reform. |
Related studies
» | South Africa - South African Reconciliation Barometer 2003-2011, Institute for Justice and Reconciliation |
Gibson L, James. ""Truth" and "reconciliation" as social indicators." Social Indicators Research 81, no. 2 (2006).