Login
Login

  • DataFirst Home
  • Open Data Portal
  • Collections
  • Citations
  • Contact us
    Home / Data Portal / REEP / ZAF-REEP-SALSS-2020-V1
REEP

South African Lockdown Smoking Survey 2020

South Africa, 2020
Get Microdata
Reference ID
zaf-reep-salss-2020-v1
Producer(s)
Research Unit on the Economics of Excisable Products (REEP)
Collections
Research unit on the Economics of Excisable Products
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Sep 20, 2021
Last modified
Oct 13, 2021
Page views
23689
Downloads
1182
  • Study Description
  • Data Description
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Related Publications
  • Identification
  • Version
  • Scope
  • Coverage
  • Producers and sponsors
  • Sampling
  • survey_instrument
  • Data Collection
  • Data processing
  • Data appraisal
  • Data Access
  • Contacts
  • Metadata production
  • Identification

    Survey ID number

    zaf-reep-salss-2020-v1

    Title

    South African Lockdown Smoking Survey 2020

    Country
    Name Country code
    South Africa zaf
    Study type

    Household Survey [hh]

    Abstract

    Between 27 March and 17 August 2020, the South African Government imposed and extended a ban on the sale of all tobacco and vaping products, as part of the lockdown to fight the COVID-19 virus. The South African Lockdown Smoking Survey (SALSS) is an online survey that collected data on cigarette smoking behaviour before, during and after this sales ban. The Research Unit on the Economics of Excisable Products (REEP), based at the University of Cape Town, conducted 3 online surveys between 29 April and 16 November to determine how individuals responded to the ban on cigarette sales during the lockdown, and to evaluate how it impacted the cigarette market in South Africa. The first and second surveys (SALSS Round 1 and Round 2) were designed to assess how cigarette smokers responded to the sales ban in terms of smoking prevalence and purchasing behaviour (prices paid, outlet type and brand choice). The third survey (SALSS Round 3) was conducted after the sales ban had been lifted and focused on how the market adjusted after the ban.

    Kind of Data

    Qualitative and quantitative data

    Unit of Analysis

    Individuals

    Version

    Version Description

    v1: Edited and anonymised for public distribution

    Version Date

    2021-09-09

    Scope

    Notes

    Rounds 1 and 2 were conducted before and during the lockdown. Modules investigated smoking behaviour, quitting, stocking up, access to cigarettes during lockdown, purchases (including price, outlet type and brand purchased), perceptions of the lockdown and COVID, and socio-economic and demographic information. Rounds 1 and 2 are cross-sectional.

    The questionnaires for Round 1 and Round 2 are similar except that Round 2 excludes detailed questions on stock-up, and added some additional questions regarding when during the lockdown respondents quit, and whether respondents ever shared individual cigarettes.

    Round 3 was conducted once the ban had been lifted, and added questions about the use of other tobacco products beyond cigarettes, such as pipe tobacco, cigars, snuff, waterpipe, and electronic cigarettes. Round 3 was a longitudinal subset of Round 2, including only respondents who agreed in Round 2 to be interviewed again.

    Coverage

    Geographic Coverage

    The survey was advertised to all South Africans using social media, specifically: Twitter (the REEP twitter account), Moya (a data-free (cost-free) instant messenger application) and Change.org (a petition website). As such there was no ex-ante sampling frame or intention to produce statistically representative estimates.

    Geographic Unit

    The lowest level of geographic information is Province.

    Universe

    The SALSS covered all South African adults (aged 18 and older) who were regular cigarette smokers (at least one cigarette per day) at the time the tobacco sales ban was announced.

    Producers and sponsors

    Primary investigators
    Name Affiliation
    Research Unit on the Economics of Excisable Products (REEP) University of Cape Town
    Funding Agency/Sponsor
    Name Role
    The African Capacity Building Foundation Funder
    Other Identifications/Acknowledgments
    Name
    Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

    Sampling

    Sampling Procedure

    The survey was developed and hosted on the SurveyMonkey website. Social media (Twitter and the petition site www.change.org) was used to advertise the survey and print media outlets were also used in Round 1. Additionally the survey advert was posted on Moya Messenger, a data-free/airtime-free instant messaging service, where user costs were covered by the survey team. Participation was encouraged by offering respondents the opportunity to win a prize.

    survey_instrument

    Questionnaires

    In each round a single self-administered online survey questionnaire was administered through SurveyMonkey. The Round 1 questionnaire was published in English and Afrikaans. Questionnaires for Rounds 2 and 3 were only published in English.

    Data Collection

    Dates of Data Collection
    Start End Cycle
    2020-04-29 2020-05-11 Round 1
    2020-06-04 2020-06-19 Round 2
    2020-09-16 2020-11-16 Round 3
    Mode of data collection
    • Internet [int]
    Data Collectors
    Name Affiliation
    Research Unit on the Economics of Excisable Products (formerly the Economics of Tobacco Control Project) University of Cape Town
    Supervision

    Ethics approval was granted by the University of Cape Town’s Commerce Faculty’s Ethics in Research Committee (ref. REC 2020/04/024).

    Data processing

    Data Editing

    Data collected by REEP was in excel format and in various files depending on the method of contact and interview. These files were collated by DataFirst into a research-ready format.

    Notes on data cleaning:
    · Incomplete surveys are included with a flag to indicate such.
    · Under 18s have been excluded as they were not supposed to answer the survey.
    · Prices have been cleaned but those that did not match DataFirst's cleaning algorithms were not dropped but rather stored in a "price - other" variable so that the analyst can decide how to process these.
    · Similarly, where the respondent indicated being unsure about the price, using words like "around, plus minus" and so on, this is indicated with a flag in the relevant rounds.

    Data appraisal

    Data Appraisal

    There were some changes to the survey between rounds 2 and 3: in Rounds 1 and 2 answers to questions on prices were open ended, resulting in some messy responses. In Round 3 this question had coded responses. This change may affect the response rate, the accuracy of the responses, and overall continuity. DataFirst coded responses Round 1 and 2 price information questions to improve comparability.

    Data Access

    Access authority
    Name Affiliation URL Email
    DataFirst University of Cape Town support.data1st.org support@data1st.org
    Access conditions

    Public access data, available to all

    Citation requirements

    Research Unit on the Economics of Excisable Products. South African Lockdown Smoking Survey [dataset]. Version 1. Cape Town: Research Unit on the Economics of Excisable Products [producer], 2021.Cape Town: DataFirst [distributor], 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25828/gqnk-6t92

    Contacts

    Contacts
    Name Affiliation Email URL
    DataFirst Support University of Cape Town support@data1st.org www.support.data1st.org

    Metadata production

    Producers
    Name Affiliation Role
    DataFirst University of Cape Town Metadata producer
    Date of Metadata Production

    2021-10-13

    Metadata version

    DDI Document version

    Version 1

    Back to Catalog
    DataFirst

    © DataFirst, All Rights Reserved.