| Value |
Category |
| -4 |
N/A |
| 1 |
Taxes are high while the quality of services provided is declining or not good |
| 2 |
Basic problems are not dealt with |
| 3 |
There is no consultation or decisions are taken unilaterally |
| 4 |
Increases are not in line with increases in input costs |
| 5 |
Rates are raised on an ad hoc basis or arbitrarily |
| 6 |
Inefficient use of rates |
| 7 |
High rates mean that the buildings cannot be maintained |
| 11 |
Rates are too high |
| 12 |
Message about place of business in city unclear from the perspective of rates |
| 13 |
Rates are high because of location |
| 14 |
Increases are exorbitant |
| 15 |
Rentals have gone up |
| 16 |
Property rates are too high and not flexible |
| 18 |
Need to reduce cost structures & to become more efficient |
| 19 |
Too high compared to other provinces or cities |
| 20 |
Rates are high and they do not allow for subsidies |
| 21 |
It takes long for the municipality to fix damaged infrastructure when reported |
| 31 |
Keep revaluing the land |
| 41 |
Pushes costs up |
| 42 |
Fuels national inflation |
| 43 |
Rates are rising in excess of inflation |
| 44 |
Electricity costs are very high and are part of input costs that cannot be controlled |
| 51 |
Rates are set with no concern for current economic conditions |
| 71 |
A number of costs are too high |
| 110 |
Too expensive for what we get |
| 111 |
Taxes are rising with no equivalent increase in service delivery |
| 112 |
Rates are very high because the area is industrial |
| 113 |
A large increase in rates which is not substantiated |
| 115 |
Local rates are over-valued in poor economic zone |
| 160 |
Cost of property is too high and does not encourage new investments |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.