Value |
Category |
-3 |
R.A. |
0 |
No problem |
1 |
Planning happens without firms in mind |
2 |
Inefficiencies in building plan approvals |
3 |
Expertise |
4 |
Facelessness |
5 |
Local gvt not aligned with national gvt |
6 |
City wants business to internalize their problems |
7 |
Export markets need to be developed |
8 |
Inconsistency between depts |
9 |
Generally positive once know who to contact |
11 |
Service is average |
12 |
See no initiative from the municipality |
13 |
Service is very poor or unsatisfactory |
14 |
Pbs not dealt with adequately & not helpful & nothing gets done |
15 |
Even to answer the phone is a problem |
16 |
Slow process in getting someone to deal with queries |
17 |
unsatisfactory if do not know anyone on the inside |
18 |
They do not improve local infrastructure & maintenance quickly |
19 |
Must be more active and more participatory |
21 |
Generally inefficient in dealing with queries |
22 |
Generally inefficient |
23 |
Municipality is very inefficient |
24 |
Incompetent administration |
25 |
Staff are very unprofessional |
26 |
Sometimes there is too much red tape to get things done |
31 |
Lack of experience & it is getting worse |
32 |
Wrong or not qualified people get the job |
33 |
Lack of understanding or knowledge of issues or of business |
34 |
Staff are not trained properly |
35 |
Very good at debt collection |
40 |
Poor service |
41 |
Turnover of staff a problem or no one to deal with consistently can be identified |
42 |
Inaccessibility to someone who can help any time of the day |
43 |
It takes too long for an issue to be addressed or slow to respond |
44 |
Not getting closure on issues |
45 |
Refunds take a very long time |
46 |
There is still scope in improved service delivery |
47 |
Staff lack skills |
48 |
Difficult to access |
49 |
Problems are not solved |
51 |
Waste their time in terms or dealing with approval |
52 |
Lack of ability to conceptualize urgency |
53 |
Requires constant follow up |
55 |
Administration response to queries is too slow |
56 |
Perform very poorly in service delivery |
81 |
Need to promote SA firms in tender |
91 |
Corruption |
92 |
Nepotism |
99 |
DNK as do not get involved with them |
100 |
Not dealt or no dealing with the Municipality or with Municipal departments |
110 |
Taxi rank close by causing problems not dealt with |
111 |
No problem as tries to assist |
112 |
Verbally doing a good job |
113 |
No problem as know who to deal with specifically in eThek |
115 |
No problem and doing a good job |
200 |
Est has received good services |
201 |
Generally good |
202 |
Queries were well handled |
203 |
Efficient |
205 |
Did sort out a specific problem |
300 |
No communication about water cuts or no notice to business |
301 |
Too long to respond |
302 |
Very difficult to get the queries across |
305 |
They do not deal with queries efficiently |
307 |
Too long to respond |
310 |
They must improve communication |
350 |
The new SMS or e-mail system is efficient |
461 |
There is still scope in improved service delivery incl in infrastructure |
462 |
Staff do not show quality customer care |
463 |
Arrogance from government staff |
464 |
Not sure if requests are followed through |
1000 |
None or no comment |
2001 |
Seems to have improved |
2002 |
Electricity and water department is fine |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.