| Value |
Category |
| -3 |
R.A. |
| 0 |
No problem |
| 1 |
Planning happens without firms in mind |
| 2 |
Inefficiencies in building plan approvals |
| 3 |
Expertise |
| 4 |
Facelessness |
| 5 |
Local gvt not aligned with national gvt |
| 6 |
City wants business to internalize their problems |
| 7 |
Export markets need to be developed |
| 8 |
Inconsistency between depts |
| 9 |
Generally positive once know who to contact |
| 11 |
Service is average |
| 12 |
See no initiative from the municipality |
| 13 |
Service is very poor or unsatisfactory |
| 14 |
Pbs not dealt with adequately & not helpful & nothing gets done |
| 15 |
Even to answer the phone is a problem |
| 16 |
Slow process in getting someone to deal with queries |
| 17 |
unsatisfactory if do not know anyone on the inside |
| 18 |
They do not improve local infrastructure & maintenance quickly |
| 19 |
Must be more active and more participatory |
| 21 |
Generally inefficient in dealing with queries |
| 22 |
Generally inefficient |
| 23 |
Municipality is very inefficient |
| 24 |
Incompetent administration |
| 25 |
Staff are very unprofessional |
| 26 |
Sometimes there is too much red tape to get things done |
| 31 |
Lack of experience & it is getting worse |
| 32 |
Wrong or not qualified people get the job |
| 33 |
Lack of understanding or knowledge of issues or of business |
| 34 |
Staff are not trained properly |
| 35 |
Very good at debt collection |
| 40 |
Poor service |
| 41 |
Turnover of staff a problem or no one to deal with consistently can be identified |
| 42 |
Inaccessibility to someone who can help any time of the day |
| 43 |
It takes too long for an issue to be addressed or slow to respond |
| 44 |
Not getting closure on issues |
| 45 |
Refunds take a very long time |
| 46 |
There is still scope in improved service delivery |
| 47 |
Staff lack skills |
| 48 |
Difficult to access |
| 49 |
Problems are not solved |
| 51 |
Waste their time in terms or dealing with approval |
| 52 |
Lack of ability to conceptualize urgency |
| 53 |
Requires constant follow up |
| 55 |
Administration response to queries is too slow |
| 56 |
Perform very poorly in service delivery |
| 81 |
Need to promote SA firms in tender |
| 91 |
Corruption |
| 92 |
Nepotism |
| 99 |
DNK as do not get involved with them |
| 100 |
Not dealt or no dealing with the Municipality or with Municipal departments |
| 110 |
Taxi rank close by causing problems not dealt with |
| 111 |
No problem as tries to assist |
| 112 |
Verbally doing a good job |
| 113 |
No problem as know who to deal with specifically in eThek |
| 115 |
No problem and doing a good job |
| 200 |
Est has received good services |
| 201 |
Generally good |
| 202 |
Queries were well handled |
| 203 |
Efficient |
| 205 |
Did sort out a specific problem |
| 300 |
No communication about water cuts or no notice to business |
| 301 |
Too long to respond |
| 302 |
Very difficult to get the queries across |
| 305 |
They do not deal with queries efficiently |
| 307 |
Too long to respond |
| 310 |
They must improve communication |
| 350 |
The new SMS or e-mail system is efficient |
| 461 |
There is still scope in improved service delivery incl in infrastructure |
| 462 |
Staff do not show quality customer care |
| 463 |
Arrogance from government staff |
| 464 |
Not sure if requests are followed through |
| 1000 |
None or no comment |
| 2001 |
Seems to have improved |
| 2002 |
Electricity and water department is fine |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.