Africa - Afrobarometer Survey 2002-2004, Merged 16 Country
Reference ID | afr-afr16-2002-2004-v1 |
Year | 2002 - 2004 |
Country | Africa |
Producer(s) |
Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA) Michigan State University (MSU) Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana) |
Sponsor(s) | African Development Bank - ADB - Funder Michigan State University - MSU - Funder US National Science Foundation - USNSF - Funder The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs - NMFA - Funder Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation |
Collection(s) | |
Metadata |
![]() |
Created on
Jan 16, 2012
Last modified
Jul 22, 2020
Page views
51702
Overview
Identification
ID Number afr-afr16-2002-2004-v1 |
Version
Version Description
v1: Edited, anonymised dataset for public distributionProduction Date
2007-08-24Overview
Abstract
The Afrobarometer is a comparative series of public attitude surveys that assess African citizen's attitudes to democracy and governance, markets, and civil society, among other topics. The surveys have been undertaken at periodic intervals since 1999. The Afrobarometer's coverage has increased over time. Round 1 (1999-2001) initially covered 7 countires and was later extended to 12 countries (1999-2001). Round 2 (2002-2004) covered the following 16 African countries:Botswana, Cape Verde, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe
Round 3 (2005-2006) surveyed citizens in 18 countries, and Round 4 (2008) 20 countries. The survey covered 34 countries in Round 5 (2011-2013), 36 countries in Round 6 (2014-2015) and 34 countries in Round 7 (2016-2018).
Kind of Data
Sample survey dataUnits of Analysis
Households and individualsScope
Notes
Each Afrobarometer survey collects data about individual attitudes and behavior, including innovative indicators especially relevant to developing societies. This includes the following topics:• Democracy - Popular understanding of, support for, and satisfaction with democracy, as well as any desire to return to, or experiment with, authoritarian alternatives.
• Governance - The demand for, and satisfaction with, effective, accountable and clean government; judgments of overall governance perfomance and social service delivery.
• Livelihoods - How do African families survive? What variety of formal and informal means do they use to gain access to food, shelter, water, health, employment and money?
• Macro-economics and markets - Citizen understandings of market principles and market reforms and their assessments of economic conditions and government performance at economic management.
• Social capital - Whom do people trust? To what extent do they rely on informal networks and associations? What are their evaluations of the trustworthiness of various institutions?
• Conflict and crime - How safe do people feel? What has been their experience with crime and violence?
• Participation - The extent to which ordinary people join in development efforts, comply with the laws of the land, vote in elections, contact elected representatives, and engage in protest. The quality of electoral representation.
• National identity - How do people see themselves in relation to ethnic and class identities? Does a shared sense of national identity exist?
Coverage
Geographic Coverage
The survey has national coverage in the following 16 African countrires: Botswana, Cape Verde, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Tanzania, Uganda, Senegal, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe.Geographic Unit
The lowest level of geographic aggregation covered by the data is region/province.Universe
The sample universe for Afrobarometer surveys includes all citizens of voting age within the country. In other words, we exclude anyone who is not a citizen and anyone who has not attained this age (usually 18 years) on the day of the survey. Also excluded are areas determined to be either inaccessible or not relevant to the study, such as those experiencing armed conflict or natural disasters, as well as national parks and game reserves. As a matter of practice, we have also excluded people living in institutionalized settings, such as students in dormitories and persons in prisons or nursing homes.Producers and Sponsors
Primary Investigator(s)
Name | Affiliation |
---|---|
Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA) | |
Michigan State University (MSU) | |
Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana) |
Funding
Name | Abbreviation | Role |
---|---|---|
African Development Bank | ADB | Funder |
Michigan State University | MSU | Funder |
US National Science Foundation | USNSF | Funder |
The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs | NMFA | Funder |
Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation | NORAD | Funder |
Metadata Production
Metadata Produced By
Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|---|
DataFirst | University of Cape Town | Metadata producer |
Date of Metadata Production
2020-07-22DDI Document Version
Version 3DDI Document ID
ddi-afr-afr16-2001-2004-v1