• Data Repository
  • Collections
  • Citations
  • Metadata Dashboard
  • Contact us
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Data Repository / AFR / ZAF-IDASA-AFB-SA-2002-V1
AFR

Afrobarometer Survey South Africa 2002

South Africa, 2002
Get Microdata
Reference ID
zaf-idasa-afb-sa-2002-v1
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25828/wcen-1f76
Producer(s)
Institute for Democracy in South Africa
Collections
Afrobarometer
Metadata
Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Dec 12, 2011
Last modified
Apr 01, 2020
Page views
146185
Downloads
2173
  • Dataset Description
  • Data Description
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Related Publications
  • Identification
  • Version
  • Scope
  • Coverage
  • Producers and sponsors
  • Survey instrument
  • Data collection
  • access_policy
  • Disclaimer and copyrights
  • Contacts
  • Metadata production
  • Citation
  • Identification

    Survey ID number
    zaf-idasa-afb-sa-2002-v1
    Title
    Afrobarometer Survey South Africa 2002
    Country
    Name Country code
    South Africa zaf
    Study type
    Public Opinion Survey
    Series Information
    Mattes, Robert. Afrobarometer: Round 2 Survey of South Africa, 2002 [dataset]. South Africa: Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA) [producer], 2004. Cape Town: DataFirst [distributor], 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25828/wcen-1f76
    Abstract
    The Afrobarometer South Africa Survey 2002 was part of Round 2 of the Afrobarometer surveys, and collected data on the attitudes and opinions of the citizens of South Africa. Respondents were asked to rate South African President Mbeki and his administrations' overall performance and to state the most important issue facing the nation. Opinions were gathered on the role of the government in improving the economy, whether corruption existed in local and national government, whether government officials were responsive to problems of the general population, and whether local government officials, the police, the courts, the overall criminal justice system, the South African Defense Force, the media, the Independent Electoral Commission, and the South African Broadcasting Corporation could be trusted. Respondents were polled on their knowledge of government officials, their level of personal involvement in political, governmental, and community affairs, the inclusiveness of the government, and what their reactions would be to executive branch-sponsored government-imposed restrictions or prohibitions on the media, the judicial system, and parliament.
    Kind of Data
    Sample survey data
    Unit of Analysis
    Households and individuals

    Version

    Version Description
    v1: Edited, anonymised dataset for public distribution
    Version Date
    2004

    Scope

    Notes

    The South African Afrobarometer 2002 covered the following topics:

    Political opinions on the role of the government in improving the economy, whether corruption existed in local and national government, whether government officials were responsive to problems of the general
    population, and whether local government officials, the police, the courts, the overall criminal justice system, the South African Defense Force, the media, the Independent Electoral Commission, and the South African Broadcasting Corporation could be trusted.

    Economic questions on the country's and the respondent's economic condition, whether great income disparities are fair, and whether encouraging people to start small businesses would create more jobs.

    Societal questions on trust in others, whether it is wise to plan ahead, whether everyone should be responsible for themselves and their own success or failure, what characteristics respondents used to identify themselves, whether it was easy to obtain assistance with securing food, water, schooling, and medical services, and by what methods respondents secured food, water, news, information, and medical services.

    Background variables include age, home language, education, current employment status, employment history, family financial situation over the last 12 months, monetary support system, whether a close friend or relative had died from AIDS, language used in interview, sex, ethnicity, type of physical disability, if any, type of housing, location of interview and respondent's attitude during interview.

    Topics
    Topic Vocabulary URI
    conflict, security and peace [4.1] CESSDA
    domestic political issues [4.2] CESSDA
    government, political systems and organisations [4.4] CESSDA
    mass political behaviour, attitudes/opinion [4.6] CESSDA
    political ideology [4.7] CESSDA
    consumption/consumer behaviour [1.1] CESSDA
    economic conditions and indicators [1.2] CESSDA
    employment [3.1] CESSDA
    unemployment [3.5] CESSDA
    crime [5.1] CESSDA
    EDUCATION [6] CESSDA
    housing [10.1] CESSDA
    community, urban and rural life [13.1] CESSDA
    cultural and national identity [13.3] CESSDA
    social behaviour and attitudes [13.6] CESSDA
    social conditions and indicators [13.8] CESSDA

    Coverage

    Geographic Coverage
    This survey has national coverage.
    Geographic Unit
    The data for the Afrobarometer South Africa survey 2002 is at country level only.
    Universe
    The survey universe is citizens of South Africa 18 years of age or older

    Producers and sponsors

    Primary investigators
    Name
    Institute for Democracy in South Africa

    Survey instrument

    Questionnaires
    There was one questionnaire for the Southern African Barometer Project Democracy Survey I (South Africa) conducted in 2000.

    Economic questions addressed the past, present, and future of the country's and the respondent's economic condition, whether great income disparities are fair, and whether encouraging people to start small businesses would create more jobs.

    Societal questions addressed how much trust could be placed in others, whether it is wise to plan ahead, whether everyone should be responsible for themselves and their own success or failure, what characteristics respondents used to identify themselves, whether it was easy to obtain assistance with securing food, water, schooling, and medical services, and by what methods respondents secured food, water, news, information, and medical services.

    Background variables include age, home language, education, current employment status, employment history, family financial situation over the last 12 months, monetary support system, whether a close friend or relative had died from AIDS, language used in interview, sex, ethnicity, type of physical disability, if any, type of housing, location of interview and respondent's attitude during interview.

    Data collection

    Dates of Data Collection
    Start End
    2002-09 2002-10

    access_policy

    Access authority
    Name Affiliation URL Email
    DataFirst University of Cape Town support@data1st.org
    Access conditions
    Public use files, available to all
    Citation requirements
    Mattes, Robert. Afrobarometer: Round 2 Survey of South Africa, 2002 [dataset]. South Africa: Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA) [producer], 2004. Cape Town: DataFirst [distributor], 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25828/wcen-1f76

    Disclaimer and copyrights

    Disclaimer
    The original collector of the data, the data distributor and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
    Copyright
    (c) 2002, Institute for Democracy in South Africa

    Contacts

    Contacts
    Name Affiliation Email URL
    DataFirst Helpdesk University of Cape Town support@data1st.org

    Metadata production

    DDI Document ID
    ddi-zaf-datafirst-afb-2002-v01
    Producers
    Name Affiliation Role
    DataFirst University of Cape Town Metadata producer
    Date of Metadata Production
    2020-04-01

    Metadata version

    DDI Document version
    Version 2

    Citation

    Citation
    loading, please wait...
    Citation format
    Export citation: RIS | BibTeX | Plain text
    Back to Catalog
    DataFirst

    © DataFirst, All Rights Reserved.