Zambia Governance Project 1993-1996

Zambia, 1993 - 1996

Get Microdata

Reference ID

zmb-msu-zgp-1993-1996-v1

Producer(s)

Department of Political Science of Political Science

Collections

Other Open Research Data

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Mar 23, 2015

Last modified

Apr 29, 2020

Page views

64299

Downloads

1290

[if unfair] in what way(s) were the elections unfair? (howfair)

Data file: zgp-1996

Overview

Valid: 0

Invalid: 0

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

loc_start_pos: 272

loc_end_pos: 273

Width: 2

Range: -9 - 11

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Categories

Value	Category
-9	missing/n.a.
1	voter registration was flawed (nikuv)
2	kaunda barred/unip could not field candidates
3	ruling party used state resources to campaign
4	ruling party had unfair access to the media
5	dirty tricks. some candidates misinformed voters
6	vote buying. candidate/party distributed money and goods
7	voters were intimidated/pressured to vote
8	voter fraud (e.g., "ghost" voters, double voting, etc.)
9	vote rigging (e.g., votes weren't counted properly, etc.)
10	other (e.g., campaign/polling period too short, low turnout)
11	no specific reason given

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Back to Catalog