Impact Evaluation of the Upgrading of Informal Settlements Programme 2010
South Africa, 2010
Get MicrodataCreated on
Jul 31, 2012
Last modified
Nov 14, 2013
Page views
943804
Downloads
814605
1.5 Marital status other (marital_status_oth)
Data file: LP_HH and individual dataset
Overview
Valid:
155
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
loc_start_pos:
759
loc_end_pos:
803
Width:
45
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 2 |
1.3%
|
|
| C0UPLE LIVING TOGETHER | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| COMMMON LAW MARRIAGE/ COUPLE LIVING TOGETHER | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| COMMOM LAW MARRIAGE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| COMMON LAW MARRIAGE | 10 |
6.5%
|
|
| COMMON LAW MARRIAGE / COUPLE LIVING TOGETHER | 2 |
1.3%
|
|
| COMMON LAW MARRIAGE.COUPLE LIVING TOGETHER | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| COMMON LAW MARRIAGE/ COUPLE LIVING TOGETHER | 15 |
9.7%
|
|
| COMMON LAW MARRIAGE/ CUOPLE LIVING TOGETHER | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| COMMON LAW MARRIAGE/COUPLE LIVING TOGETHER | 6 |
3.9%
|
|
| COMMON LAW MARRIEGE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| COMMON LWA MARRIAGE/ COUPLE LIVING TOGETHER | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| COMMON-LAW MARRIAGE/ A COUPLE LIVING TOGETHER | 2 |
1.3%
|
|
| COMMON-LAW MARRIAGE/ COUPLE LIVING | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| COMMON-LAW MARRIAGE/ COUPLE LIVING TOGETHER | 8 |
5.2%
|
|
| COMMON-LAW MARRIAGE/ COUPPLE LIVING TOGETHER | 2 |
1.3%
|
|
| COMMON-LAW MARRIEGE/COUPLE LIVING TOGETHER | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| COMMON-LAW MERRIAGE / COUPLE LIVING TOGETHER | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| COUPLE LIING TOGETHER | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| COUPLE LIVING TOGEHTER | 2 |
1.3%
|
|
| COUPLE LIVING TOGETHER | 30 |
19.4%
|
|
| COUPLE LIVING TOGTHER | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| COUPLE STEYING TOGETHER | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| COUPLE WITH LIVING TOGETHER | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| COUPLELIVING TOGETHER | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| COUPLENLIVING TOGETHER | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| COZ NOT OF MARITAL STAGE | 2 |
1.3%
|
|
| Couple living together | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| IS NOT OF MARITAL STATUS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| LIVING WITH COUPLE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| MARRIAGE WIFE DIED | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| MARRIAGE/COUPLE LIVING TOGETHER | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| N/A | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| N0T OF A MARITUL STATUS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NOT AT MARITAL STAGE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NOT F MARITAL STAGE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NOT FOR MARRIED AGE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NOT MARITAL AGTAGE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NOT MARITAL STAGE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NOT OF A MARITAL STAGE | 3 |
1.9%
|
|
| NOT OF A MARITUAL STATUS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NOT OF A MARITUL STATUS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NOT OF MARITAL STAGE | 13 |
8.4%
|
|
| NOT OF MARREID STAGE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NOT OF MARRIAGE STAGE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NOT OF MARRIED STAGE | 19 |
12.3%
|
|
| NOT OF MERITAL STAGE | 2 |
1.3%
|
|
| No of that status | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| Not of marital stage | 2 |
1.3%
|
|
| mogamously marreied | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| not of marital stage | 1 |
0.6%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.